The Fayetteville Museum of Art demonstrated valiant resolve to keep its doors
open during a shaky economy and amid criticism. Committed to its mission in the
face of public scrutiny, the museum was dependent on donations and support from
the community to survive.
After the museum published the
blueprint of their contemporary building to
be built in Festival Park, the drama began
and has played out in the local newspapers.
From the whine of frisbee enthusiasts who
wanted open space in Festival Park, to City
Councilman Theodore Mohn initiating the
City’s Task Force to review the museum’s financial records in 2008, the drama
unfolded publicly.
All the speculation, criticism, fingerpointing
and innuendo ended when the
museum announced it would have to close
it doors on May 31, 2010 due to the lack of financial support to sustain the operation.
The Fayetteville Observer’s coverage of
the situation culminated in a lengthy article
(“Why Did the Museum Fail?” 5/30/2010)
which highlighted some of the events that
have taken place since the museum opened
in 1971. The time line in the article skipped
many years during the museum’s history,
picking up the story in 2007, 2008 and
2009.
The above article noted two obstacles
that prevented large financial support
of the museum —a grant from the Arts
Council and the possible support of a bill
by Senator Tony Rand to support of the
museum’s new building. Both did not take
place.
I think the statement in the Observer’s
article by one of the city’s task force
members, George Breece, says it all,
“Museum officials were slow to understand
there had been a political shift against the
park location.”
How could the museum know the
political shift had changed after they were
given two acres in Festival Park in April 2007? They proceeded to have a renowned
architect design a stunning contemporary building.
It’s all debatable — people who are interested in the arts, either for political
reasons or for their affection of the arts, have an opinion about the “political shift”
and any contributing factors that contributed to the museum closing.
For me, after much reflection, I see it as a long story. If chapters in the story
had been scripted different, we would have a different ending.
First and foremost, an art museum in Fayetteville will always have a difficult
task to support itself until more large donors come to the table consistently.
Not only big donors, but it is also the responsibility of all art advocates in the
community to buy a membership, participate in the events and buy art from the
museum, the museum store and from local artists.
Support of the museum was so much more than going to a Fayetteville After
Five event. It’s an annual, monthly commitment to being a part of making a
museum possible, making the arts possible.
Those members of the community who have given large sums of money for
support and for those of you who have regularly given what you could, you are the
reason the museum was able to hold on as long as it did. Without you, the museum
could not have existed since 1971.
For those who are interested in the arts, didn’t contribute to its operation,
but thought others would make the museum an art venue for the community and
the museum would always be there — well, here we are. It’s a part of the story,
a chapter that could have been scripted differently with a lot more support from
members in the community.
Then there was the 2004 chapter when plans were in place for a building at the
opening to Festival Park. We covered it in Up and Coming Weekly; we fought the
fight for the museum to find its new home where the Lundy Building now stands.
The museum was strong, the economy was strong, the downtown was hot with
investors, and was poised for the museum to move to Festival Park.
Again, politics thwarted the move for
the museum. The Downtown Development
Corporation presented the Lundy Group
building to the City of Fayetteville; their reasons
for not accepting the PennMark proposal
(which included the museum of art) was simply
“it did not meet the requirements for new
projects downtown” (“DDC Already Answers
Questions”, Up and Coming Weekly, November
24-30, 2004).
John Malzone, successful downtown real
estate agent and developer, stated the following
in reference to the choice between the Lundy
Building and the PennMark proposal: “To select
other projects (the Lundy proposal) because of
political pressure would send a terrible signal
to the investment community” (Fayetteville
Observer, 11/28/04).
The Lundy proposal boasted about its
plans “to construct a building that would
have shops and restaurants on the fi rst fl oor
and offi ces on the second and third floor
(Fayetteville Observer, August 14, 2004). The
Lundy building was selected and built (details
of what it cost the city are not included here).
Those plans were never fulfilled.
In the article titled “Festival Park and
the FMA: Red Flags are Flying”, (Up and
Coming, December 8-14, 2004) the red flags
were clearly listed and they all came true:
“doubts about the DDC’s lack of sensitivity
to the Renaissance Plan for an arts complex
downtown” and “do we have such a poor
image of ourselves (as a city) that we think
developers will be interested in us (Fayetteville)
if we hand over prime real estate right next to a
park which is being developed by the city.”
We can nit-pick all the details between the
DDC and city council’s decisions, not having
the foresight to see the Fayetteville Museum
of Art where the Lundy building stands in 2004. Now I hear people in 2010 say:
“Wouldn’t it be a great idea for the Fayetteville Museum of Art to purchase the
Lundy building?” Great idea, but the support of the idea is just six years too late for
our community.
In the end, the Fayetteville Museum of Art has made a significant impact on
this community over the years and there are many people in the community who
have helped to keep them operational.
Thank you to those who made the museum possible, and to Tom Grubb,
Michele Horn and the entire staff at the Fayetteville Museum of Art for all the years
you tirelessly spearheaded so many amazing exhibits every month, over and over
again, year after year, for the people of Fayetteville and the region; for giving so
many children an opportunity to engage in the arts in your youth programs.
When I think of the Fayetteville Museum of Art, I remember the quality it
ascribed to, paintings that would wow you as you walked into the gallery, sculpture
installations that brought awe, photographs, prints and sculptures that made
a difference for so many, for so many years. I will remember all the wonderful
receptions hosted by the museum, the quality of their intent and dedication,
moments where you could meet and mingle with individuals who knew the value of
the arts.
The negative affects of not having a museum of art are immediate, but it will
also have harmful far reaching effects. What it says about our community as a
whole is not positive. The Fayetteville Museum of Art, like the arts in
Fayetteville, was always a fragile
gem in our community. Over the
years, it needed to be protected by
the many, not just the few.
An Artist’s Perspective on the Museum Closing