Views

Jim Hunt: The Legacy of a Very Fine Man

5James Baxter Hunt, known to people in North Carolina, across the United States, and around the world as plain old Jim Hunt, left us a few short weeks ago at well-earned age of 88.
His fingerprints are everywhere in our community, in our state, and in educational circles everywhere and have been for about 50 years. North Carolina is successful and growing state in large part because of Jim Hunt.
Native Tar Heels know how he led our state, and newer arrivals have benefited from his political life, whether they know it or not.
Jim Hunt’s list of accompaniments is too long to fit into roughly 600 words, but collectively they changed, shaped, and improved a largely-rural North Carolina. To birth them, he cajoled legislators, educators, and
business leaders. He was relentless and almost always prevailed.
We can thank Hunt, at least in part, for the early learning program Smart Start, which did just that for young children. For universal public kindergarten.
For the state School of Science and Math, which gives North Carolina’s brightest high schoolers a superior educational start in those fields.
For national board certification for teachers. For getting teacher pay up to the national average, although we are at the bottom now.
For the gubernatorial veto and gubernatorial succession, both of which gave North Carolina a more balanced distribution of powers. For the Hunt Institute, a think tank of educational policy, research, and leadership, which partners with the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University.
After serving 16 years as Governor in 4 separate terms, Hunt retired from elective politics, but he was hardly out to pasture. He traveled on behalf of causes he supported, largely educational initiatives and economic development opportunities for North Carolina.
He also stirred our state’s political pots, offering his long expertise to fledging and experienced candidates. He was known to say, “Now, looka, here. This is what we need to do.” The wise listener took his advice.
One of those candidates was his own daughter, Rachel Hunt, of whom he was very proud and who now serves as North Carolina’s Lieutenant Governor.
Only once did Jim Hunt ever lose an election, and that was in 1984, when he challenged sitting US Senator Jesse Helms. It was a bitter and racially tinged contest, that many view as the precursor to today’s ugly
politics. 
Buckets of ink have been used writing about Jim Hunt, especially in the days following his death. One remembrance that stands out for me is by Barry Saunders, a retired opinion columnist for the Raleigh News and Observer. Saunders recalls in that paper an economic development trip he took with Governor Jim Hunt and his entourage to South Africa in 1994, shortly after apartheid officially ended there but was fresh in everyone’s minds. Saunders was the only person stopped by South African airport officials, ostensibly because he was a journalist. Saunders recounts the story this way. 
“That’s when Gov. Hunt, who’d been several yards ahead of me when the kerfuffle began, peeled off from this entourage and came back to find out what was the issue.
“He’s with me,” he said and voila, I was admitted to the country.
“I’d first met Governor Hunt 10 years earlier, in 1984, when he’d come…to campaign while seeking to unseat U.S. Senator Jesse Helms….I finagled an invitation.”
“…Hunt…lost a vicious battle with Helms by four points. “As I’m guessing is true of many Tar Heels who traveled to other states during that period, I was often asked how I could live in a state that elected someone like
Jesse Helms. “My immediate and true response was it was a state that also elected people like Jim Hunt.”
His was a life well lived and all of us in North Carolina are better for it.

(Photo: Jim Hunt served North Carolina as governor in four separate terms. He brought about changes in the education system within the state. Photo courtesy of Wikipedia)

Troy's Perspective: Local politicians coming together

6Leaders of Cumberland County government and the City of Fayetteville have historically had different governance styles, which have affected their collaboration. However, recent efforts led by Chairman Kirk deViere's re-election for an unprecedented second year and Fayetteville's 5th-term mayor, Mitch Colvin, have significantly improved that relationship. This shift aims to boost residents' confidence in ongoing community efforts and future collaboration, fostering a sense of unity and shared progress.
Colvin and deViere, once political rivals, are now dedicated to bridging the leadership gap between city and county. Their focus on community progress and addressing key issues, such as the county's Tier One status, aims to inspire residents and stakeholders by demonstrating a united effort to improve our community and foster hope and collective pride.
A critical community concern is the county-wide 911 call center, a vital part of public safety. It offers a direct connection to law enforcement, medical, and fire services, ensuring help reaches those in need quickly and efficiently. deViere and Colvin are solidly backing centralized, county-wide 911, which is essential for building trust and confidence in our community's safety infrastructure and reassuring residents about their safety and well-being.
Mayor Colvin welcomed three new Fayetteville Council Members to his legislative body. The integration of these first-term members into the mayor's agenda will be closely watched. Early signs from at least one new council member might indicate a potential conflict with the mayor. While respect and unity are essential for sound decision-making, a push-and-pull dynamic can often lead to more robust discussions and outcomes. Understanding these leadership dynamics helps residents stay informed about local governance and decision-making processes.
Colvin defeated Mario Benavente, a harsh critic of the mayor and a former District 3 Councilmember. The question is whether one of the new members will bring the same negative energy to the meetings as he did.
Just a block away on Dick Street, Commissioner Chairman Kirk deViere marked one year of leadership. On Dec. 1, his colleagues expressed strong confidence in him by re-electing him as their chairman for another year. Typically, the board of commissioners does not re-elect chairs for consecutive terms; however, deViere's impressive leadership skills won the support of all but one of his colleagues. Commissioner Glenn Adams, the naysayer, publicly criticized deViere's re-election as chair and his influence regarding a controversial community project.
Kirk deViere, a former Fayetteville city council member and state senator, is a solid consensus builder and visionary, the kind of leadership that has been lacking in our community at times. The collaboration between Fayetteville's mayor and the board of commissioners' chairman is refreshing. Finally, two elected leaders are seemingly more interested in building a better community than in displaying competing egos or advancing personal agendas. Let's hope they can keep this going and bring about the kind of changes our community desperately needs.
2025 is ushering out the old, while 2026 is bringing in the new, hopefully, a different brand of politics with elected leaders committed to positive change for our community.

Letter to the Editor: Fayetteville’s dinner meetings and the erosion of open government

4Letter to the Editor: Closed City Council Dinner Meetings Violate NC Laws for Open Meetings

The recent CityView article exposing Fayetteville’s “dinner meetings” should trouble every citizen who values transparency and lawful governance. What is described is not simply an informal gathering over food—it is a parallel system of government operating in a locked, upstairs room where major public business is discussed, shaped, and in some cases effectively decided before the public ever enters the first-floor council chambers.
That is not how open government works in North Carolina.
When the entire City Council meets at 5:30 p.m., behind a badge-lock door, with a staff escort required for entry, in a cramped room that can barely seat eight citizens, they are not hosting a “casual dinner.” They are holding an official meeting under North Carolina General Statutes 143-318.9–318.18.
The law is unambiguous:
If a majority of members gather to deliberate public business, the public has the right to attend, observe, and understand the
decision-making process.
Yet these dinner sessions routinely involve:
• Deliberations on developer contracts and litigation decisions,
• Strategy discussions before televised council meetings,
• According to former and current members, informal voting.
This practice circumvents both the spirit and the letter of the Open Meetings Law. Accessibility is not satisfied by posting a notice while placing the meeting in a locked, inaccessible location. A council member even acknowledged that the structure is designed to “make it not as easy” for the public to attend—an admission that should alarm anyone familiar with the statutory prohibition on meetings held to evade public scrutiny.
Equally concerning is the absence of written agendas, the destruction of audio recordings after minimal minutes are approved, and the use of a meeting format that no comparable municipality in North Carolina employs. When the public must guess what happened upstairs while watching a scripted performance downstairs, trust in government is not just eroded—it is actively undermined.
This is not about politics. It is about governance, law, and the public’s right to know.
If Fayetteville wants to restore confidence in City Hall, the first step is straightforward:
Move the dinner meetings to the first-floor chamber, publish agendas, livestream the proceedings, and treat them as the official meetings they clearly are.
North Carolina provides numerous resources and training opportunities precisely so that local governments avoid these pitfalls. Fayetteville’s leadership should immediately engage with:
• The North Carolina Open Government Coalition (Elon University)
• The North Carolina Press Association’s Open Meetings resources
• The Attorney General’s Open Government Unit
These organizations exist to ensure public bodies operate transparently and in full compliance with state law. The fact that Fayetteville’s dinner meetings resemble none of the best practices recommended by any of them speaks volumes.
This city deserves better. Transparency is not a campaign slogan—it is a legal duty.
Respectfully,
—Darden Jenkins, Fayetteville

The truth in aging

5As 2026 barrels toward us, we Americans have some significant pondering to do on a problem that is uncomfortable for most everyone. By Americans, I mean Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and people who may not bother to vote but who are nonetheless affected by decision-makers running our government.
The problem is that many of our political leaders, both Democrats and Republicans, are simply too old to be effective in their jobs. Some of them have the potential to be flat-out dangerous.
Think Joe Biden, who froze during a debate broadcast around the world.
Think Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell, who did the same thing multiple times in public, and we have no idea what happened in private.
Think California Senator Diane Feinstein, who repeated questions during Senate committee hearings and reportedly sometimes did not know where she was.
Think South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond, who fondled teenage pages and died at 100, just six months after leaving office.
And think Donald Trump, who, love him or loathe him, is not the same person he was during his first term as President and who now openly dozes in meetings, calls women journalists “piggy,” and rages online at night.
Each of these leaders is/was at least in his/her late 70s, and others are/were considerably older.
Age is a delicate topic because most people of a certain age function well or not as private citizens, not public officials. Our loved ones may worry about our health and our decision-making abilities, but whatever they may be, they do not affect thousands or millions of others.
When the United States was formed, our Founding Fathers (there were no official Founding Mothers) realized there should be age minimums and wrote them into our Constitution—25 for members of the US House of Representatives, 30 for members of the US Senate, and 35 for US President. North Carolina’s Constitution also has minimum ages—21 for the NC House, 25 for the NC Senate, and 30 for Governor.
And, oh my goodness! US Supreme Court justices and federal judges hold constitutionally mandated lifetime appointments. Many do resign for all sorts of reasons, but some who do not wind up in the same advanced age situations as elected politicians. They make decisions for others that are difficult, if not impossible, to change.
Most other advanced nations limit legislative and judicial service through term limits or mandatory retirement ages, but most of the US does not. The North Carolina General Assembly actually raised the retirement age for appellate judges from 72 to 76 to accommodate the birthday of a conservative Supreme Court Justice it wanted to keep in place—clearly a move in the wrong direction!
Little, if any, thought was given to age limits, probably because in the late 18th century, life was shorter than it is now and few lingered in old age, which is often prolonged today by modern pharmaceuticals. George Washington died at 69, and while Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin made it into their 80s, the average lifespan for a man in 1800 was around 40. With life being so short, there was apparently little, if any, thought given to decision-makers who overstay their capabilities.
That simply was not a problem in the early days of our nation.
It is now.
While many older Americans—you and I know plenty of them—remain vibrant and capable well into old age and to their last breaths, many do not. This becomes a serious issue when they are making life-changing decisions not only for themselves but for millions of Americans and others around the world.
Remedying the United States’ dilemma of aging decision makers will not be easy and will involve the participation of some of those same decision makers.
That said, we need to proceed for the sake of a nation that has evolved dramatically over its 250 years of existence.

Molly the Warrior Princess and the $400 cup of coffee

5You meet the nicest people in the waiting room of an Emergency Veterinary Clinic. They care about their animals despite the cost. I know this from personal experience after spending quality time there Thanksgiving weekend. We have two dogs, Jasper the Wonder Bionic Dog and Molly the Warrior Princess.
Once upon a time, about 8 years ago, Jasper was hanging out under a car at Lindy’s restaurant looking for lunch. Jasper was rescued by our neighbors, Javan and Cindy. Jasper is like Blanche DuBois; he depends upon the kindness of strangers. Despite being cat people, they saved him from his vagabond life. They took him to the vet for a check-up to have him neutered for adoption.
Due to Molly needing her own dog, we promised to adopt him after a trip.
Jasper is an escape artist. After a period of recuperation, he escaped. While on the roam, he managed to get his leg broken by an unpleasant encounter with a car. After the hit-and-run incident, another nice lady found him hiding under a car.
Coincidentally, she took him to the same vet who had treated him. The vet recognized Jasper. He contacted our neighbors, who rescued him for a second time. Jasper was not covered by Medicaid, so they picked up the cost of repairing his broken leg. When we got back from our trip, Jasper moved down the block to our house, where he has been ever since.
Life on the streets was tough on Jasper. He had several interesting health challenges in the last year. Like me, he suffered hair loss. Multiple trips to a local vet produced a diagnosis of a thyroid condition. The thyroid meds didn’t work. Troubles continued. A visit to the NC State Veterinary clinic resulted in a large out-of-pocket charge and a diagnosis of Cushing’s Disorder. New meds were prescribed, which are slowly restoring his fur. I am considering taking some of Jasper’s pills. But I digress.
Suddenly, last summer, Jasper’s health deteriorated. It turned out he had doggy diabetes. Who knew dogs could get diabetes?
Apparently, Cushing’s disorder can lead to diabetes. He began two daily insulin shots and fancy diabetic dog food, which stabilized his blood sugar. Then abruptly, he began to go blind, bumping into various things. It was a sad time. Ever vigilant, my wife Lani found an animal eye clinic in Cary for a consult. Jasper had cataracts. Dogs can have lens replacements for cataracts just like humans. Do not ask what dual cataract replacement surgery costs. He had the surgeries, which were a great success.
He sees perfectly while on a daily regimen of diabetic dog food, two insulin shots, a Cushing pill, and three types of eye drops.
All this leads to the $400 cup of coffee. I was giving Jasper one of his eye drops. The cap to the tube of eye juice fell off the table and disappeared. Molly was standing excitedly nearby in anticipation of the treat both dogs get when Jasper gets medicated. The cap was gone. Had Molly eaten it?
We looked everywhere. We moved furniture. No luck. Vanished. Dachshunds are notorious eaters. She must have snapped it up and swallowed it when it hit the floor. Rats. The cap was too large for it to pass through her. Time to visit the Emergency Vet for puke induction. I remonstrated vigorously with Molly about eating the cap, but she remained unrepentant.
At the Vet ER, the waiting room filled up. They took her out of turn to try to get the cap out of her before it advanced to a major plugging location. Two puke-inducing rounds of meds were given. No cap. Next was an X-ray. While waiting, a large, actively friendly Labradoodle named Kaboo, wearing the cone of shame collar, sat comfortably on my foot. Kaboo and I bonded. Dogs are no respecters of personal space. I contacted home to ask for yet another final search for the errant cap. Ten minutes later, I got the text. The cap had been in my son’s shoe, where it had been hiding in the toe. Some Olympic quality bounce had put it there. Huzzah!
I gingerly approached the front desk and asked to stop the presses. The cap had been found in a shoe. Relieved, but feeling like a moron, I waited for Saint Molly the Innocent to be brought back out.
I finally discovered there was a Keurig coffee maker for humans in the waiting room. I made a cup of coffee, even adding sugar and cream to ease my financial and sense of doggy hypochondria to get some return on my money, even if it was only a $400 cup of coffee. The Vet tech told me Molly said I could not be her friend anymore. She was kidding. Molly was happy as a proverbial clam to see me.
Discharge Diagnosis: Owner is Stupid. Moral: Always look in the toe of your shoes.

Latest Articles

  • How to celebrate, commemorate America’s semiquincentennial
  • Massey Hill Lions Club holds annual oyster roast
  • Ease back in: Fun, local ways to restart your fitness routine
  • Veteran brings hockey passion, recreation opportunities to Fort Bragg’s Cleland Ice Rink
  • Local stars shine at 2025 Hoops & Dreams Showcase
  • 2025 according to Jimmy Jones: The year America looked in the mirror and argued with itself
Up & Coming Weekly Calendar
  

Login/Subscribe