- Details
-
Wednesday, 14 May 2025
-
Written by Jimmy Keefe
We’ve all heard the saying, “If you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is stop digging.” Unfortunately, it appears we have doubled down on the dig.
In 2013, during my tenure as Chairman of the Cumberland County Commissioners, I presented a bold vision: a new Performing Arts Center to anchor and energize our downtown, a vision rooted in the 1996 Marvin Plan for downtown revitalization. Over the past three decades, additional studies by professionals have consistently supported the need for a large entertainment complex in our city center. This project had the potential to be transformational — the largest public investment ever made downtown, yet here we are, once again watching politics derail a project that has broad support and proven economic potential.
One of the most misunderstood aspects of the Crown Event Center is how it’s funded. The facility would be financed using restricted revenues from the Food & Beverage Tax and a portion of the Local Occupancy Tax. These funds cannot be used for public safety, infrastructure, or social services. They are strictly designated for arts and entertainment projects and must be administered through the Crown Commission, which currently oversees the Crown Complex. Delays risk forfeiting access to these funds altogether, a long-term loss this community simply cannot afford.
Before the current Board of Commissioners initially paused the project, it was ahead of schedule and under budget. Over $40 million has already been spent — and that figure excludes future costs related to legal action, contractual penalties, repairs, and the damage done to our community’s image. To put this in perspective, the entire downtown baseball stadium project was budgeted at $35 million. Delaying or abandoning the Performing Arts Center now is akin to stopping the stadium mid-construction and surrendering that investment with nothing to show for it
When I was first elected commissioner in 2008, my daughter Emily was not yet a year old. She is now preparing for her senior year of high school. We have lost almost two decades of opportunity for her and other children in our community to grow up with access to a vibrant arts venue. While my family has enjoyed countless nights at the baseball stadium — thanks to the foresight and commitment of city leaders — those same benefits have been denied to families passionate about the arts. Our community has far too few spaces for young people interested in theater, music, and dance. In Wake County, a similar facility supports nearly 20 youth programs. Why can’t Cumberland County do the same?
The decision to build downtown was not made lightly. Over many years, there were countless stakeholder meetings, professional consultations, citizen surveys, and financial analyses. Of the multiple sites evaluated, the top three were all located downtown. The current Crown Theater site on Highway 301 consistently ranked at or near the bottom in every report. The original plan — when the new Crown Coliseum was built in the mid-90s — was to demolish the aging arena and theater, and for good reason. These buildings have long outlived their purpose and are no longer fit for modern, accessible, or revenue-generating events.
This new Crown Event Center is more than a cultural hub — it’s an engine for economic development. Currently, Cumberland is the only county in North Carolina with more than 250,000 residents that doesn’t have a facility like this. The proposed downtown location meets every reasonable criterion: it’s on public land, has planned parking, supports local and surrounding businesses, and allows for future growth. Experts believe the design and location could make the facility self-sustaining. Contrast this with the proposal to renovate the old site on Highway 301 — an area with a 60-year history of economic stagnation. That’s like halting the downtown baseball stadium after millions invested and deciding to renovate J.P. Riddle Stadium instead. Many believe it to be a short-sighted move that ignores everything we’ve learned.
Some commissioners cite concerns about parking downtown, but anyone who’s attended multiple events at the Crown Complex knows that parking logistics are already a challenge at the existing site. In fact, simultaneous events could result in longer walks to your seat than what you’d face downtown — not to mention downtown’s potential for shared-use garages, walkability, and business synergy.
There’s also been talk about a dispute over architectural fees. While I’m aware of the issue, halting a $145 million project over a disagreement representing less than 1% of the total cost does not seem logical. Imagine building a $200,000 home, getting a $2,000 overage bill, and choosing to abandon the house after investing $50,000. No reasonable person would make that decision — yet that seems to be the path we are on.
In conclusion, it appears there is concern from some members of the board on this downtown project that has been thoughtfully planned for over three decades — one that is fully funded, publicly vetted, and widely supported. There seems to be a push to replace it with an underwhelming alternative that lacks a plan, funding, vision, or economic upside. I respect their need to get up to speed, but the delays — now surpassing 60 days — are already generating millions in additional costs and potentially irreversible setbacks. This self-inflicted harm may ultimately be used to justify abandoning the downtown project, which would be a tragic mistake for our community.
Let’s be clear: this Crown Event Center is not just about bricks and mortar — it’s about who we are and who we want to be. A thriving, culturally rich, economically vibrant Cumberland County needs this facility. I can only hope elected leaders will act swiftly to continue with the plan for this downtown entertainment center.
(Photo: The proposed Crown Event Center in downtown Fayetteville is shown here in an artist's rendering from EwingCole.)
- Details
-
Wednesday, 14 May 2025
-
Written by Bill Bowman
The shooting incidents a few weeks ago that disrupted the Dogwood Festival, Downtown Fayetteville’s most anticipated Springtime event, have triggered a plethora of misguided assumptions and solutions to addressing crime in our community. Fayetteville Mayor Mitch Colvin’s response to this recent shooting incident was to initiate recommendations for a youth curfew, along with other placebo-style regulations, like banning face masks and backpacks on city property and during city-sponsored events (say goodbye to Fourth Fridays & Fayetteville After Five). Soviet style surveillance cameras, license-plate readers, and sophisticated facial recognition technology, and increasing the Crime Stoppers reward to $5,000 will only encourage criminals to snitch on other criminals. Honestly, Colvin’s quick response to target Fayetteville’s youth as the catalyst of this crime crisis is misguided, and makes his rash recommendations resonate more like the foundation of his campaign re-election speech.
Defying reason and common sense, the City Council in their infinite wisdom voted 8 to 2 for Colvin’s citywide youth curfew, with only councilmen Mario Benavente and Deno Hondros voting against it. Mario B articulated his concerns clearly and questioned the curfews' effectiveness, the complex logistics of curfew enforcement, and, more importantly, the negative impact they would have on young people who would be introduced prematurely to the criminal justice system. He also reminded the council that of all the homicides this year in Fayetteville, only one juvenile was arrested for attempted murder, and that an imposed youth curfew would not have deterred any of them.
Mario B was the voice of reason. In the council’s haste to make it look like they are being responsive to the escalating shooting issues, they have failed to consider Fayetteville’s history of rejecting youth curfews in the city for many reasons, especially the negative impact additional community surveillance would have on restricting civil liberties. Ironically, Colvin wants Fayetteville’s curfew ordinance to be modeled after that of Charlotte-Mecklenburg's curfew ordinance. Really? It makes you wonder who at City Hall vetted that program?
Most likely, it was the same people who hired contractor Muhammad Muhammad to build the Fayetteville City Parks & Rec Tennis Complex, and the sidewalks on Rosehill Rd... or the construction company that built the new Fire Station on Bragg Blvd. I don’t mean to be facetious, but it doesn’t take that much to be diligent and prudent when it comes to making decisions that impact the entire community. To my point, Charlotte’s curfew ordinance was adopted in 2011 and is extremely complex and begs the question of how to implement proper and effective enforcement. Even more importantly, is the fact that after 14 years, Charlotte officials readily admit they have no data or concrete evidence that can support the curfew ordinance had any effect on reducing crime. However, the cost of implementing the program is readily available.
Curfew ordinances cannot take the place of parental responsibilities. Parents and adult guardians are responsible for protecting young people from victimization and exposure to criminal activity. Ordinances should promote the safety and welfare of all citizens without violating or restricting their rights or freedoms. Curfews do not reduce crime, and there is little evidence that curfews are even effective in addressing the root causes of juvenile crime. Using the city of Charlotte as a model may be convenient, but I doubt it is prudent. Data available and collected in 2025 indicated that Charlotte has a higher average rate of both violent and property crimes compared to other cities in North Carolina. (Google it.)
City Councilman Mario B’s insights are logical and well thought out. He brings a much-needed thread of common sense, logic, and caution to the consideration of using youth curfews as a means to curb Fayetteville shootings, crime, and overall gun violence.
I’ll conclude by saying the Fayetteville community would benefit greatly if our elected officials handled serious municipal challenges with less pompous grandstanding and emotional knee jerk reactions, and spent more time listening to more concerned citizens. Youth advocate Tony Brown, Fayetteville resident Justin Herbe, and Bishop McNeil, a respected and active Fayetteville community organizer who understands that reducing crime and addressing public safety in Fayetteville cannot come from restricting a young person’s civil liberties or implementing proven failed measures like youth curfews.
Like Bishop McNeil, we feel Fayetteville’s elected officials should direct their attention, money, and efforts to projects and programs that have the potential to eliminate violence and crime, like treating mental illness, affordable housing and job training, and opportunities. Listen to Mario B. Curfews don’t work!
Thank you for reading Up & Coming Weekly, and while you’re here, take a moment to participate in our 28th Annual Best of Fayetteville survey. Your voice and opinion matter to us.