Views

It comes down to rhythm

Details

Tuesday, 10 February 2026

Written by Dan DeBruler

It all comes down to rhythm. Whether we’re talking about our health, our habits, even our faith—everything thrives on rhythm. Think about fitness for a moment. You don’t build strength by hitting every machine in the gym on day one. You don’t lose weight or grow healthier by starving yourself for a week. That might look impressive for a moment, but it does more damage than good. By the end of the week, you’re not more fit—you’re frustrated and sore, and you might have a craving for lasagna and cupcakes.
Real growth is steady. It’s shaped by rhythm—the kind you can sustain. Health is formed when we consistently make choices that feed it. You learn which habits contribute to strength and which ones drain it. You find your pace, your pattern, your rhythm.
Faith isn’t any different. You don’t build a faith that lasts by burning bright for a weekend. We’ve all been through a motivational speech or moment only to find ourselves back at the same point by Wednesday. You build faith that lasts by finding the rhythms that lead you back to God again and again. You get to know the things that strengthen faith: time in prayer, time in the Word, time in quiet reflection. You get to know God -- the One who is the object of that faith. Study His character. Learn His habits. Take a long look at His track record. You’ll see a faithful God inviting you to live faithfully.
But many believers never quite build that rhythm. In the opening chapters of Living by the Book, Bible teacher Howard Hendricks tells the stories of people who never learned how to study Scripture. Their reasons are familiar: “I don’t know how.” “I don’t have time.” “It’s boring.” Others say, “It’s not relevant,” or “It’s too hard to understand.” And plenty will admit, “I’m just not a reader.” The Bible can seem too big, too old, or too complex to tackle.
But the truth is—the problem isn’t with the Bible. It’s with our approach to it.
Hendricks taught that spiritual growth, like physical health, starts with rhythm. He called it a lifelong habit of observation, interpretation, and application. In other words, you don’t just read the Bible, you study it. You don’t just collect information—you apply what you learn. Step by step, day by day, truth begins to take root.
Think of it like this: imagine claiming to be married to someone you only talk to every three months. The relationship wouldn’t last long, would it? Yet many of us treat God that way—checking in occasionally but never establishing any sense of rhythm.
You don’t drift into health, and you don’t drift into faith. Both require rhythm. So start small. Be consistent. And remember—lasting faith isn’t built in a moment. It’s built in rhythm, over a lifetime, with a God who never stops showing up.

The state of North Carolina: A people magnet

Details

Tuesday, 10 February 2026

Written by Margaret Dickson

As a relatively new grandmother, I get frequent “growing like a weed” comments, and my grandbabies are doing just that—getting bigger and better every day.
So too is their home state, a fact that warms this tarheel-born and-bred writer’s heart.
Recent data from the US Census Bureau confirms that North Carolina bounced into the fastest growing state spot in 2025 with a whopping 84,000 new residents, bumping both Texas (2024) and Florida (2023) down the line. We now have nearly 11.2 million residents, with most of our growth coming from what demographers call “domestic migration,” people leaving other states to come to North Carolina. Some projections have us passing Georgia and Ohio to become the 7th largest state in the early 2030s. There is also the possibility of enhanced political clout at the national level with an additional seat in Congress based on our population boom.
And who is coming?
Many are people interested in high-paying jobs in banking and in technology. They may actually “work” in another state through remote communications, but want to live and raise families here. Access to both the ocean and mountains, cities large enough to have attractive amenities but are not metropolises, and temperate weather are big draws. Retirees are coming for many of the same reasons.
Population growth is clearly desirable in all sorts of ways—an expanding economy with more workers, additional investment and tax base, and more consumers to purchase goods and services. Our incoming residents are also likely to be more diverse culturally and educationally than our native population, which makes North Carolina a more interesting place to be.
Growth brings its challenges as well.
More people mean more public needs, including public services like roads, bridges, and public transit. Rush hour in Charlotte, Raleigh, and—yes, Fayetteville—confirms this in about 30 seconds. Our new residents need places to live, which can drive up both demand for housing and its affordability. More people call for both more and more extensive health care options, and children they bring with them need more, and in many cases, better schools. More people generate urban sprawl that eats into natural areas and farm lands and creates various environmental issues, as we have seen in both our mountains and our coastal areas.
Most of our new residents are drawn to urban centers, both for jobs and for culture. This means they spend their money there, further exacerbating North Carolina’s increasingly clear urban-rural divide. Urban areas with larger tax bases and more educated residents are thriving, while rural areas can rarely compete with the schools, health care, and amenities of our cities. Political and cultural conflicts can be threatening and highly divisive.
All of which is to say, North Carolina’s future requires smart planning at both the state and local levels. Our General Assembly must be willing to invest in our state’s infrastructure, both in cities and in rural areas, instead of cutting budgets and giving tax breaks to top earners and corporations, many of which are based outside North Carolina. It must stop starving public education and sending our tax dollars to barely regulated private schools, many of them with a religious slant. Local governments must be creative in attracting new residents to their areas and persistent in their efforts to provide quality education and health care.
The bottom line here is that if North Carolina does not continue to offer a high quality of life attractive to newcomers, some of our “domestic migrants” are going to politely migrate to some other state that does.

Troy's Perspective: The 2026 primary election

Details

Tuesday, 10 February 2026

Written by Troy Williams

The 2026 Election Primary begins this week. Unlike municipal elections, these races are partisan: Democrats are on one side, Republicans on the other, and unaffiliated voters must choose which primary they wish to participate in. The ballots will include options for voting on candidates from the local board of commissioners up to the U.S. Senate.
Former U.S. Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill wisely stated, "All politics is local." This insightful remark highlights the significant role that community issues play in political decisions. Engaging at the local level is crucial for fostering meaningful change and progress. While variations of this phrase date back to 1932, U.S. elections have become increasingly nationalized in recent decades. In the context of the current polls, all politics has become national, even at the local level.
When politics becomes predominantly national, it influences how voters act at the local level. Instead of focusing on the qualifications of local candidates and their potential to improve daily life, voters often prioritize national agendas and partisan ideologies, which can overshadow local concerns.
Should we prioritize whether our local candidates genuinely align with the ideologies of the WOKE left or the MAGA right? It's crucial to consider which perspective will truly serve our community's best interests. All contests on the ballot are essential, especially the Cumberland County Board of Commissioners.
Local boards of commissioners play a vital role in daily life, serving as the primary legislative and policy-making bodies for county governments. They manage local budgets, set property tax rates, approve land-use plans, and oversee essential services, including public health, emergency services, and infrastructure. Ultimately, the elected officials who serve on these boards are significant in their communities.
In the Democratic primary, there are four open seats on the Board of Commissioners: two for District 1 and two at-large. In District 1, one incumbent is seeking reelection, facing four challengers, and in the at-large seats, two incumbents are seeking reelection, facing four primary challengers. National politics isn't likely to play a role in the primary, but it will in the general election. No one has filed opposition to District 1 primary winners; however, two Republicans have filed for the at-large seats and will square off against the two Democratic survivors in November.
No one knows for sure, but it is expected that the popularity of the leading candidate on the ballot will influence candidates in lower positions. In this scenario, it is likely that former Democratic Governor Roy Cooper will affect turnout for local Democrats, and his Republican opponent, who will probably receive an endorsement from Trump, will influence down-ticket Republicans.
Many of us are hoping for a strong primary election. The county commissioner races are crucial. This election should focus on what is best for Cumberland County, rather than a WOKE versus MAGA debate.

Three Wishes for the Telehealth Genie

Details

Tuesday, 10 February 2026

Written by John Hood

According to folklore, extraordinary beings resent being confined within ordinary spaces. In “The Fisherman and the Jinni,” one of the stories Sheherazade tells her misguided husband in One Thousand and One Nights, the being in question is so angry at being imprisoned for centuries in a bottle that he has to be tricked into granting wishes rather than killing his lowly liberator outright. In Disney’s Aladdin, the genie isn’t so vengeful but still describes his confinement as “phenomenal cosmic powers” uncomfortably crammed into an “itty bitty living space.”
The real world isn’t teeming with mystic flasks or misty sorcerers. But to the people who first told fairy tales around campfires, our modern abilities to tame the elements, construct labor-saving devices, cure diseases, and fly through air and space would look an awful lot like sorcery. And, truth be told, our real world is teeming with would-be heroes trying desperately to bottle up disruptive discoveries and technologies.
Take artificial intelligence. Might it displace workers, deform journalism, debase literature, and place destructive new weapons in the hands of diabolical foes? Yes. Caution is warranted. It cannot, however, be un-invented, permanently stunted, or monopolized by a few self-appointed guardians. To believe otherwise is, indeed, to remain in a fantasy world. As a practical matter, we have no choice but to develop and use AI, as prudently and productively as we can, so as to maximize its benefits and minimize its risks.
I feel the same way about a less “gee-whiz” innovation that nevertheless presents promise as well as some peril: telehealth.
Although the digital technologies and practice models behind telehealth services predate the COVID-19 pandemic, it catalyzed a dramatic expansion. Patients needed help. Hospitals were, by necessity, limiting exposure. Physicians, therapists, and other providers were, too. So, barriers to telehealth fell. Only some were reinstated after the crisis.
Over the past five years, this innovation has proven itself to be cost-beneficial. “Telehealth is not a silver bullet,” wrote Josh Archambault and Joshua Reynolds, coauthors of a new report on the subject, “but it remains one of the most efficient and cost-effective ways to expand access to care, particularly in underserved rural communities.”
Published by the Massachusetts-based Pioneer Institute and Texas-based Cicero Institute, the report grades the 50 states according to how much they’ve adjusted their administrative and regulatory policies to facilitate provider and patient use of telehealth.
North Carolina, I’m sad to say, fares poorly in the Pioneer-Cicero study. We earn, and I do mean earn, one of the 10 failing grades Archambault and Reynolds assign. We make it too difficult for North Carolinians to obtain services from medical providers in other states. We don’t explicitly define telehealth in a neutral manner, allowing for a range of time sequences and modes (live vs. prerecorded, audio-only vs. full video, live check-ins vs. remote monitoring of conditions, etc.) based on patient and provider preferences. And we don’t allow nurse practitioners to deliver the full range of services for which they are licensed — whether remotely or in-person — without the costly and largely superfluous oversight of physicians.
Before reading the report, I was generally familiar with the case for telehealth reform and expansion. I’ve written about it before. What I didn’t yet know, however, is that the federal government has created new financial incentives for the practice under its Rural Health Transformation Program. About half of the $50 billion in grants will be awarded according to policy mix, not just baseline need, with access to telehealth represented in the grant formula both directly and indirectly.
The A-plus states of Arizona, Colorado, Delaware and Utah know what North Carolina has yet to accept: telehealth is here to stay. It’s never going back in the bottle. So let’s grant it three wishes: 1) define telehealth properly, 2) permit patients to use it freely, and 3) empower nurse practitioners to deliver it efficiently. The results won’t be miraculous. But telehealth can expand access while moderating costs. That’s good enough.

Editor’s note: John Hood is a John Locke Foundation board member. His books Mountain Folk, Forest Folk, and Water Folk combine epic fantasy with American history (FolkloreCycle.com).