Views

1775: The White Christmas no one wanted

8Two hundred and fifty years ago during the week of Christmas, thousands of Carolinians were trudging through deep snow. They weren’t in search of Christmas trees, or heading over the river and through the woods to their grandmothers’ houses for holiday feasting. These were Patriot militiamen, from both Carolinas, hunting for Tories in modern-day Greenville County, South Carolina.
The Snow Campaign of 1775, as it came to be known, was the second act of a revolutionary drama that began earlier in the year when the royal governors of North and South Carolina were each chased out of their capitals — New Bern and Charleston, respectively — to the safety of British warships anchored off shore.
The governors, in turn, attempted to rouse anti-revolution Carolinians to come to the defense of king and Parliament. There were, indeed, thousands of such Loyalists in the Carolinas, including merchants, lawyers, and other professionals in the towns as well as Scottish Highlanders, former Regulators, and other dissenters in the backcountry.
Some responded by assembling as Loyalist militia companies. Others responded to Patriot calls to do the same.
The first major clash between the two sides occurred in mid-November in the distinctively named South Carolina town of Ninety Six. 
While more Loyalists than Patriots died in the battle, it produced mixed results. The Loyalists withdrew across a nearby river, allowing the Patriots to withdraw in good order from Ninety Six. The campaign continued into
December. A key Loyalist objective was to transport guns and ammunition westward into Cherokee territory and convince the Indians to join in attacks on the Patriots. Sixteen years earlier, during the final stage of the French and Indian War, Cherokees infuriated by what they viewed as mistreatment by their longtime British allies had switched sides and attacked all along the Carolina backcountry. It proved to be a costly mistake. Cherokees lost men and land.
When the Revolutionary War broke out in 1775, British agents promised guns and revenge if the Cherokees would join their cause and fight the Patriots. This wasn’t as strange an offer as it sounds today. While British governors had supervised the earlier war against the Cherokees, many of the officers and virtually all the men who’d killed Cherokee warriors and burned Cherokee settlements were Carolinians in militia service. Now these men led or filled the ranks of the Patriot militia.
As it happened, the British strategy did bear fruit — eventually. By the summer of 1776, a significant number of Cherokee chiefs were ready to enter the war on the British side. But 250 years ago, as hundreds
of Loyalists marched through the snow with weapons intended for Cherokee hands, they were set upon by many thousands of Patriots.
The main clash occurred on December 22, 1775 at the Great Cane Break on the Reedy River, near modern-day Simpsonville, South Carolina. The Patriots surprised and thoroughly routed the Loyalists, capturing the supplies meant for the Cherokees. All did not end well for the Patriots, however. Right after the battle came a terrible storm. It reportedly snowed for 30 hours straight. Inadequately clothed and provisioned, many militiamen suffered frostbite and other permanent injuries. Even those who made it home intact recalled the “Snow Campaign” of 1775 with dread and  loathing.
Among those homeward-bound militiamen, victorious but chilled to the bone, were my 5th-greatgrandfather John Worke of Rowan County, my 5th-great granduncle Thomas Sumter (who would later win fame as the “Carolina Gamecock”), and Mecklenburg County militia captains Thomas and Moses Shelby, my first cousins, six generations removed.
Thousands of Carolina militiamen had gotten their first taste of battle during the Snow Campaign, at Ninety Six or the Great Cane Break. Some would fight again in 1776, against the Cherokees in the west or British invaders on the coast. Others would next see action in 1780, when the British finally took Charleston and prosecuted their long-desired campaign into the Carolina backcountry.
But few would remember their White Christmas of 1775 with fondness.

Editor’s note: John Hood is a John Locke Foundation board member. His books Mountain Folk, Forest Folk, and Water Folk combine epic fantasy with American history (FolkloreCycle.com).

Troy's Perspective: Lumbee recognition will improve lives

6A few weeks ago, residents of Robeson County felt a sense of pride and connection as Congress and President Trump granted the Lumbee Tribe the recognition they had fought for over a century. The
Lumbee Tribe, one of the largest Native American tribes in the Southeast, has a long history rooted in Robeson County. This recognition highlights their cultural contributions and historical
significance, making it an important milestone that can inspire community pride and unity.
Robeson County, one of the poorest counties in North Carolina, is poised for positive change and is likely to benefit neighboring counties as well, fostering a sense of optimism and community pride among residents. While the recognition itself does not guarantee immediate economic gains, it can open doors for grants, cultural programs, and community projects that contribute to local growth. As the community
explores new ideas, this shared progress can strengthen our collective identity and pride in
Robeson's future.
Cumberland County, located just north of Robeson, is poised to benefit from Robeson's increased affluence, especially with the completion of I-295 and improved accessibility to I-95 south. The Lumbees' tribal recognition does not automatically guarantee the establishment of a nearby casino. In fact, only about 42 percent of federally recognized tribes operate gaming facilities, totaling 474 across 28 states. The remaining 58 percent, or 329 tribes, do not have gaming operations, which can help residents feel more informed and less anxious about potential gaming developments.
However, casinos can offer job opportunities for residents of tribal lands, where unemployment rates are often high, such as in Robeson County. Given the potential benefits, it's difficult not to support Robeson and its various growth possibilities. While Robeson faces many challenges, we hope for a lasting positive change in the community.
Gaining national recognition for your shortcomings rather than your strengths can be quite challenging. A few years ago, I spoke with a criminal justice scholar from John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York about strategies for engaging at-risk communities without relying on law enforcement. My focus was on exploring alternative law enforcement strategies specifically for Fayetteville. During one of our discussions,
the professor unexpectedly shifted the topic to Lumberton in Robeson County, mentioning that its murder rate was higher than that of Chicago. I left that discussion feeling troubled. The profes-sor wasn't prejudiced; he was simply analyzing data from behind his desk, and the statistics regarding Lumberton, NC's murder and crime rates stood out.
I empathize with our southern neighbor. Poverty and crime have a strong, complex correlation. Economic hardship, limited opportunities, and community disadvantage contribute to this issue. While not a direct cause-and-effect relationship, property crime often links directly to need.
I am genuinely excited about how the recent events will positively impact Robeson County and its neighboring areas, because I believe the negatives are about to change into positives. I hope that some scholars are observing this situation with a critical eye. More importantly, I pray that God will bless this community, helping them achieve prosperity and success without limits.

Troy's Perspective: Local politicians coming together

6Leaders of Cumberland County government and the City of Fayetteville have historically had different governance styles, which have affected their collaboration. However, recent efforts led by Chairman Kirk deViere's re-election for an unprecedented second year and Fayetteville's 5th-term mayor, Mitch Colvin, have significantly improved that relationship. This shift aims to boost residents' confidence in ongoing community efforts and future collaboration, fostering a sense of unity and shared progress.
Colvin and deViere, once political rivals, are now dedicated to bridging the leadership gap between city and county. Their focus on community progress and addressing key issues, such as the county's Tier One status, aims to inspire residents and stakeholders by demonstrating a united effort to improve our community and foster hope and collective pride.
A critical community concern is the county-wide 911 call center, a vital part of public safety. It offers a direct connection to law enforcement, medical, and fire services, ensuring help reaches those in need quickly and efficiently. deViere and Colvin are solidly backing centralized, county-wide 911, which is essential for building trust and confidence in our community's safety infrastructure and reassuring residents about their safety and well-being.
Mayor Colvin welcomed three new Fayetteville Council Members to his legislative body. The integration of these first-term members into the mayor's agenda will be closely watched. Early signs from at least one new council member might indicate a potential conflict with the mayor. While respect and unity are essential for sound decision-making, a push-and-pull dynamic can often lead to more robust discussions and outcomes. Understanding these leadership dynamics helps residents stay informed about local governance and decision-making processes.
Colvin defeated Mario Benavente, a harsh critic of the mayor and a former District 3 Councilmember. The question is whether one of the new members will bring the same negative energy to the meetings as he did.
Just a block away on Dick Street, Commissioner Chairman Kirk deViere marked one year of leadership. On Dec. 1, his colleagues expressed strong confidence in him by re-electing him as their chairman for another year. Typically, the board of commissioners does not re-elect chairs for consecutive terms; however, deViere's impressive leadership skills won the support of all but one of his colleagues. Commissioner Glenn Adams, the naysayer, publicly criticized deViere's re-election as chair and his influence regarding a controversial community project.
Kirk deViere, a former Fayetteville city council member and state senator, is a solid consensus builder and visionary, the kind of leadership that has been lacking in our community at times. The collaboration between Fayetteville's mayor and the board of commissioners' chairman is refreshing. Finally, two elected leaders are seemingly more interested in building a better community than in displaying competing egos or advancing personal agendas. Let's hope they can keep this going and bring about the kind of changes our community desperately needs.
2025 is ushering out the old, while 2026 is bringing in the new, hopefully, a different brand of politics with elected leaders committed to positive change for our community.

Jim Hunt: The Legacy of a Very Fine Man

5James Baxter Hunt, known to people in North Carolina, across the United States, and around the world as plain old Jim Hunt, left us a few short weeks ago at well-earned age of 88.
His fingerprints are everywhere in our community, in our state, and in educational circles everywhere and have been for about 50 years. North Carolina is successful and growing state in large part because of Jim Hunt.
Native Tar Heels know how he led our state, and newer arrivals have benefited from his political life, whether they know it or not.
Jim Hunt’s list of accompaniments is too long to fit into roughly 600 words, but collectively they changed, shaped, and improved a largely-rural North Carolina. To birth them, he cajoled legislators, educators, and
business leaders. He was relentless and almost always prevailed.
We can thank Hunt, at least in part, for the early learning program Smart Start, which did just that for young children. For universal public kindergarten.
For the state School of Science and Math, which gives North Carolina’s brightest high schoolers a superior educational start in those fields.
For national board certification for teachers. For getting teacher pay up to the national average, although we are at the bottom now.
For the gubernatorial veto and gubernatorial succession, both of which gave North Carolina a more balanced distribution of powers. For the Hunt Institute, a think tank of educational policy, research, and leadership, which partners with the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University.
After serving 16 years as Governor in 4 separate terms, Hunt retired from elective politics, but he was hardly out to pasture. He traveled on behalf of causes he supported, largely educational initiatives and economic development opportunities for North Carolina.
He also stirred our state’s political pots, offering his long expertise to fledging and experienced candidates. He was known to say, “Now, looka, here. This is what we need to do.” The wise listener took his advice.
One of those candidates was his own daughter, Rachel Hunt, of whom he was very proud and who now serves as North Carolina’s Lieutenant Governor.
Only once did Jim Hunt ever lose an election, and that was in 1984, when he challenged sitting US Senator Jesse Helms. It was a bitter and racially tinged contest, that many view as the precursor to today’s ugly
politics. 
Buckets of ink have been used writing about Jim Hunt, especially in the days following his death. One remembrance that stands out for me is by Barry Saunders, a retired opinion columnist for the Raleigh News and Observer. Saunders recalls in that paper an economic development trip he took with Governor Jim Hunt and his entourage to South Africa in 1994, shortly after apartheid officially ended there but was fresh in everyone’s minds. Saunders was the only person stopped by South African airport officials, ostensibly because he was a journalist. Saunders recounts the story this way. 
“That’s when Gov. Hunt, who’d been several yards ahead of me when the kerfuffle began, peeled off from this entourage and came back to find out what was the issue.
“He’s with me,” he said and voila, I was admitted to the country.
“I’d first met Governor Hunt 10 years earlier, in 1984, when he’d come…to campaign while seeking to unseat U.S. Senator Jesse Helms….I finagled an invitation.”
“…Hunt…lost a vicious battle with Helms by four points. “As I’m guessing is true of many Tar Heels who traveled to other states during that period, I was often asked how I could live in a state that elected someone like
Jesse Helms. “My immediate and true response was it was a state that also elected people like Jim Hunt.”
His was a life well lived and all of us in North Carolina are better for it.

(Photo: Jim Hunt served North Carolina as governor in four separate terms. He brought about changes in the education system within the state. Photo courtesy of Wikipedia)

The truth in aging

5As 2026 barrels toward us, we Americans have some significant pondering to do on a problem that is uncomfortable for most everyone. By Americans, I mean Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and people who may not bother to vote but who are nonetheless affected by decision-makers running our government.
The problem is that many of our political leaders, both Democrats and Republicans, are simply too old to be effective in their jobs. Some of them have the potential to be flat-out dangerous.
Think Joe Biden, who froze during a debate broadcast around the world.
Think Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell, who did the same thing multiple times in public, and we have no idea what happened in private.
Think California Senator Diane Feinstein, who repeated questions during Senate committee hearings and reportedly sometimes did not know where she was.
Think South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond, who fondled teenage pages and died at 100, just six months after leaving office.
And think Donald Trump, who, love him or loathe him, is not the same person he was during his first term as President and who now openly dozes in meetings, calls women journalists “piggy,” and rages online at night.
Each of these leaders is/was at least in his/her late 70s, and others are/were considerably older.
Age is a delicate topic because most people of a certain age function well or not as private citizens, not public officials. Our loved ones may worry about our health and our decision-making abilities, but whatever they may be, they do not affect thousands or millions of others.
When the United States was formed, our Founding Fathers (there were no official Founding Mothers) realized there should be age minimums and wrote them into our Constitution—25 for members of the US House of Representatives, 30 for members of the US Senate, and 35 for US President. North Carolina’s Constitution also has minimum ages—21 for the NC House, 25 for the NC Senate, and 30 for Governor.
And, oh my goodness! US Supreme Court justices and federal judges hold constitutionally mandated lifetime appointments. Many do resign for all sorts of reasons, but some who do not wind up in the same advanced age situations as elected politicians. They make decisions for others that are difficult, if not impossible, to change.
Most other advanced nations limit legislative and judicial service through term limits or mandatory retirement ages, but most of the US does not. The North Carolina General Assembly actually raised the retirement age for appellate judges from 72 to 76 to accommodate the birthday of a conservative Supreme Court Justice it wanted to keep in place—clearly a move in the wrong direction!
Little, if any, thought was given to age limits, probably because in the late 18th century, life was shorter than it is now and few lingered in old age, which is often prolonged today by modern pharmaceuticals. George Washington died at 69, and while Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin made it into their 80s, the average lifespan for a man in 1800 was around 40. With life being so short, there was apparently little, if any, thought given to decision-makers who overstay their capabilities.
That simply was not a problem in the early days of our nation.
It is now.
While many older Americans—you and I know plenty of them—remain vibrant and capable well into old age and to their last breaths, many do not. This becomes a serious issue when they are making life-changing decisions not only for themselves but for millions of Americans and others around the world.
Remedying the United States’ dilemma of aging decision makers will not be easy and will involve the participation of some of those same decision makers.
That said, we need to proceed for the sake of a nation that has evolved dramatically over its 250 years of existence.

Latest Articles

  • How to nurture mind, body during cold months
  • DistiNCtly Fayetteville's American Independence Trail
  • Setting goals for new year can help jumpstart productivity
  • A look back at Up & Coming Weekly's 2025 stories
  • No pain, no problems: Arthroscopic surgery restores shoulder worn down by life
  • CCF sees record 2025 GivingTuesday donations
Up & Coming Weekly Calendar
  

Login/Subscribe